|
|
The Final Frontier
To secure his place in history, Phil Mickelson must stop equivocating and finally beat Tiger head-to-head. January 22, 2007 By Cameron Morfit Senior Writer, GOLF.com Phil Mickelson may have shed 20-25 pounds of fat, and gained 10-15 of
muscle in the off-season, but he still wears a lot of black
(it’s slimming, don’t you know). He still combs his
hair straight back, Pat Riley style, and still talks science anytime,
anywhere. After pounding his drive down the third fairway at the
Classic Club at the Bob Hope on Friday, he turned to one of his amateur
playing partners and said, “So hear me out,” before
expounding on the virtues of ethanol vis-à-vis our national
energy conundrum.
He knocked his ball on the green, poured in his 20-foot
birdie putt, and after barely a fist pump, kept right on talking
current events. On the par-5 fourth hole he hit a 297-yard rocket off
the tee, and a 249-yard fairway wood to 13 feet behind the hole, and
made the eagle putt. Ethanol could wait; this called for knuckle-bumps
all around.
In other words, the Hope may have temporarily turned into the British
Open last week, when snow fell in Malibu, but Mickelson is still
Mickelson. In fact he likened Palm Springs on Sunday to Maui in January
(too windy), which is why he no longer plays the Mercedes. In an
early-week press conference he faulted, as much as his swing, his gear
for the pesky left-to-left drive that, among other indignities, gave
the U.S. Open to Geoff Ogilvy. Having worked with his coach Rick Smith
and Callaway club technicians, Lefty proclaimed, “I really
think that shot is going to be eliminated most of the time.”
We’ll see.
Less Filling Phil? Mickelson says he's slimmed down and hopes improved fitness will lead to better play late in the season.Marc Feldman/WireImage.com
|
Mickelson has always been hard to pin down, and he was last week. He
went 3-over-par for his first four holes, then turned it around during
an opening-round, 2-under-par 70. He didn’t look ready to
win, as I predicted he would, but then again, with a winning score of
only 17-under, this didn’t look like the Hope.
The real test comes this week at the Buick Invitational at Torrey
Pines, where Tiger Woods will begin his 2007 season. Without have to
baby-sit three amateur partners, and presumably without the
bone-chilling cold, Mickelson will be free to focus. Both past
champions at Torrey, he and Woods each feel some ownership of the
event, since Lefty is a lifelong San Diegan, and Woods has owned the
course as a kid (Junior World) and as a pro (nine top-10 finishes in
nine starts, including six top-threes and four Ws).
But while Tiger’s legacy is secure whether or not he
surpasses Jack Nicklaus, Mickelson has much to prove.
Can his new physique see him through the last day of the Presidents Cup
on September 30? “I don’t feel as though I stood up
physically [in 2006],” he said last week.
Did Phil the Spill’s Winged Foot crash landing leave any
permanent damage, the kind that affects scoring on Sunday afternoon at
Augusta? “Dealing with failure is part of the
game,” he said. “I deal with it 90 percent of the
time.”
Most of all, Phil’s got to prove he can take down Tiger, at
least once. He’s got the better of his nemesis before, most
notably at the 2006 Masters and 2000 Tour Championship, but never
head-to-head. Vijay Singh has done it. So have Darren Clarke,
Costantino Rocca and Hal Sutton, among others. Mickelson has not.
History will show that his standing relative to Woods took the biggest
hit at Winged Foot, where pundits were already anointing him as the de
facto number one. Had he made par on 18, there would have been no
doubt, and you have to wonder whether Woods would have then racked up
six straight wins, including the British Open and PGA.
With 29 victories and three majors, Mickelson could quit today and be
remembered as one of the top five players of his era, with Singh,
Woods, Ernie Els and Retief Goosen. He is a shoe-in for the Hall of
Fame, obviously. Is that enough? Mickelson has always said his family
comes first, and his aw-shucks vibe suggests he doesn’t live
or die with each shot. But at 36 he also seems to feel a sense of
urgency. He seems to know his legacy won’t depend on how many
times he wins the Hope.
Lee Trevino and Tom Watson are known for trumping Jack Nicklaus, Billy
Mayfair for beating Woods in L.A. (the “1” in
Tiger’s 10-1 playoff record, 10-2 if you count his loss to
Padraig Harrington at the Dunlop Phoenix in November). As much as his
two PGA titles and one green jacket, Singh will be remembered for
taking Woods’s top ranking, albeit briefly, in 2004.
Mickelson, Mayfair’s friend, seems to realize he’ll
ultimately be measured against the best, too.
“It was fun,” Mickelson said of the day he looked
Woods in the eye and nearly won, at the 2005 Ford Championship at Doral
(now the WGC-CA Championship), or the time he nearly took over
Woods’s number one ranking, or maybe a composite of
would-haves, should-haves and could-haves.
“It was fun,” he continued, “and I
certainly want to get back to that level where I’m able to
compete in each tournament, compete against Tiger week-in and week-out.
But again, it’s not easy. He’s a remarkable
player.”
It’s not easy? He’s a remarkable player?
That’s pretty well established. But so, too, is Mickelson a
remarkable player. It’s time for him to stop hedging his bets
and get on with the business of becoming a legend.
|